Zentrum für Medien-, Kommunikations- und Informationsforschung (ZeMKI)
Lade...
Country
DE
City
Bremen
107 Ergebnisse
Filter
Einstellungen
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 10 von 107
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, How to research cross-media practices Investigating media repertoires and media ensembles(2016-11); In einer Zeit der „deep mediatization“ (Couldry und Hepp, 2016: 34–56) – der fortschreitenden Verflechtung verschiedener gesellschaftlicher Bereiche mit Medien (Livingstone, 2009: 1) – gewinnen crossmediale Ansätze zur Untersuchung der Mediennutzung zunehmend an Relevanz. In diesem Zusammenhang müssen wir crossmediale Praktiken auf mindestens zwei verschiedenen Ebenen betrachten. Die erste Ebene bezieht sich auf das „Individuum“, dessen crossmediale Nutzung als ein bestimmtes „Medienrepertoire“ charakterisiert werden kann (Hasebrink und Domeyer, 2012). Die zweite Ebene bezieht sich auf „soziale Domänen“ (Gemeinschaften, Organisationen etc.), die als kommunikative Figurationen verstanden werden können, die durch ein bestimmtes „Medienensemble“ gekennzeichnet sind (Hepp und Hasebrink, 2014). In der Regel konzentriert sich medienübergreifende Forschung entweder auf das Individuum oder auf den sozialen Bereich. Diese Perspektiven kommunizieren selten miteinander. Im Gegensatz zu einer solchen Trennung schlagen wir eine Verschränkung beider Perspektiven vor, um das konzeptionelle und empirische Verhältnis von Mediennutzung als individueller Praxis und als Teil einer Figuration zu klären. Auf der Ebene des Individuums setzen sich Medienrepertoires aus medienbezogenen kommunikativen Praktiken zusammen, mit denen sich Individuen auf die Figurationen beziehen, an denen sie teilhaben. Auf der Ebene der Figurationen sind Medienensembles durch die medienbezogenen kommunikativen Praktiken der Akteure im jeweils untersuchten sozialen Feld gekennzeichnet.BerichtBand:No. 15 (2016)85 150 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, 34 56 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, Who is afraid of fake news? Public attitudes on questions concerning the sources, distribution, and impact of fake news in Israel(2026-04)Nossek, HillelThis article analyzes public attitudes in Israel toward the definition, sources, distribution, and perceived impact of fake news. It draws on an online survey of 502 respondents aged 15 and above conducted during the March 2019 election campaign. The findings indicate that a majority adopts a definition aligned with academic consensus, viewing fake news as news-like content that presents false information with the intent to mislead for political or economic gain. Social networks are identified as the main channels of dissemination, while traditional media and personal networks are regarded as more trustworthy sources of information. A central result is the confirmation of the third-person effect: only 21% of respondents believe their own voting behavior could be influenced by fake news, whereas 49% assume that others are more susceptible. Attitudes toward fake news vary significantly across demographic factors such as education, age, sector, religiosity, political orientation, and income. The study underscores the continued relevance of professional journalism in verifying information and mitigating the effects of misinformation, while highlighting the interaction between global patterns and local sociocultural contexts.BuchBand:005931 33 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, KI-Governance im Hochschulwesen – Erkenntnisse aus der Implementierung kommunikativer KI und KI-basierter formativer Rückmeldeverfahren(2025-12); ; Die Implementierung von Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) im Sinne von KI-basierten Werkzeugen in Hochschulen ist eine Aufgabe von Vielen und eine von vielen Aufgaben. Über die Perspek-tive einer KI-Governance adressiert der Beitrag, wie und in unter welchen Bedingungen KI ihren Weg in Hochschulen finden kann. Ausgehend von den Governance-Fragen werden zent-rale „Lessons Learned“ im Rahmen des durch das BMFTR-geförderte Projekt „IMPACT“ zur Implementierung von KI in eine Hochschul-Governance vorgestellt und eingeordnet.BuchBand:005284 63 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, How to research cross-media practices? Investigating media repertoires and media ensemblesIn a time of deep mediatization, cross-media approaches to investigating media practices are becoming increasingly relevant. In this respect, we have to consider cross-media from at least two different perspectives. The first perspective considers the ‘individual’ whose cross-media use can be characterized as a particular ‘media repertoire’. The second refers to ‘social domains’ (collectivities and organizations) that can be analysed as communicative figurations characterized by a particular ‘media ensemble’. We propose to interlace both perspectives to help clarify the conceptual and empirical relationship between media use by individuals, on the one hand, and as part of the figuration of a social domain, on the other. From the perspective of the individual, media repertoires are composed of media-related communicative practices that individuals use to relate themselves to the figurations that they are involved in. From the perspective of these figurations, media ensembles are characterized by the media-related communicative practices of the actors involved in them. We argue that a methodological triangulation of media diaries, (group) interviews and sorting techniques is a productive way forward to qualitatively investigate both these perspectives.Wissenschaftlicher ArtikelBand:23Heft:447 91 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, Resilient Journalism After Platformization: AI, Precarity, and Policy Pathways for Germany in Comparative Context(2026-06)Kramp, LeifThis policy paper on “Resilient Journalism After Platformization: AI, Precarity, and Policy Pathways for Germany in Comparative Context” locates a capacity gap at the heart of contemporary journalism. Practitioners still articulate a strong mission for democratic reporting, yet the structural conditions of their work increasingly constrain what they can actually do. From this diagnosis the paper develops a framework of resilient journalism that ties common-good orientation to capabilities at the individual, organizational and societal level, set within an actor ecology that reaches from audiences and communities to platforms and funders. The analysis follows four coupled pressure vectors: labor precarity, platform intermediation, AI transformation and the funding gap for public-interest reporting. Empirically, the paper draws on an original 2025 survey of more than one thousand German journalists conducted in cooperation with the Deutscher Journalisten-Verband (DJV), supplemented by selected international research, comparative cases and legal context. Its evidence approach is deliberately bounded: the survey grounds a descriptive, subgroup-based capacity diagnosis, while comparative cases and legal context serve as design references. The recommendations prioritize survey-grounded action on working conditions and newsroom AI resilience and treat public-value funding, philanthropy coordination and local communication ecologies as evaluable designs. Germany serves as the principal case in a comparative frame shaped by European, North American and DACH reference points.BuchBand:000111 24 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, The Complexities of Mediatization: Charting the Road AheadThis chapter discusses some of the complexities of mediatization that have appeared in the volume. Firstly, we reflect on the complexities related to the institutional, cultural and social dimensions of mediatization as well as the various levels of mediatization (e.g., with reference to a macro-micro scale). Secondly, on this basis, we systematize the main features that run through the complex nature of the mediatization process, and we account for three kinds of complexity: the complexity of the media environment or landscape, the complexity of an entanglement of practices with digital media technologies, and the complexity of the levels of analysis. Reflecting these complexities, in a third section, the chapter delineates some future trajectories of mediatization research.Teil eines Buches16 40 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, Solving the crisis with “do-it-yourself heroes”? The media coverage on pioneer communities, Covid-19, and technological solutionismProtective shields and medical devices produced in Makerspaces as well as the early detection of disease through self-measurement have been widely publicized in the media coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic. This article systematically examines this phenomenon by analyzing the coverage of the Maker and Quantified Self movements in Germany and the UK. Through a discourse analysis of (online) newspapers, the article demonstrates that during the pandemic the coverage of both pioneer communities was markedly positive. Makers were often portrayed as problem solvers, while Quantified Self members were depicted as seismographs of the pandemic. Overall, our analysis reveals an overarching narrative that constructs members of these groups as “do-it-yourself heroes” who respond to the Covid-19 pandemic through their experimental practices, promoting a form of technological solutionism.Wissenschaftlicher ArtikelBand:50Heft:217 26 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, “German Version better”: Mimetic Normativity in TikTok Daʿwa(2025-03)Günther, ChristophThis article explores how TikTok’s short video format facilitates a distinctive mode of religious instruction that simplifies Islamic norms into binary categories of “right” (ḥalāl) and “wrong” (ḥarām). Focusing on two case studies, I highlight how Muslim content creators convey ethical guidance by referencing the Qurʾan and Hadith while omitting the nuanced discursive traditions of Islamic jurisprudence and contextual knowledge. The brevity of the videos limits critical engagement with complex theological discussions, presenting norms as supra-historical and detached from human experience. This leaves audiences to debate the norms presented in comment threads, without explicit acknowledgment of scholarly expertise. Additionally, I employ a performance-centred approach to analyse how TikTok’s functional logics and affordances, including collaboration, humour, spatial settings, and app features like hashtags and captions, shape the presentation and reception of religious content. These elements, combined with audience interactions and the app’s user interface, constitute a “technosocial setting” that frames the couple’s performative enactments of Islamic teachings. This setting not only influences audience interpretation but also facilitates memetic engagement, reinforcing TikTok’s role as a platform for disseminating simplified religious norms in an engaging, collaborative manner.BuchBand:4828 20 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item-typ:Veröffentlichung, Between fairness optimization and ‘inequalities of dataveillance’: The emergence and transformation of social indices in German school monitoring and managementDrawing on a critical data studies as well as a tech design perspective, this chapter provides insights into the role and impact of (digital) data infrastructures as powerful new tools of relation making and decision support in everyday school monitoring and management. We hereby built on a large body of empirical material collected in past and ongoing research projects to show how, in both school monitoring and management, new powerful entanglements of actors and digital technologies (e.g. State Monitoring Data Systems, School Management Information Systems, Learning Management Software) around ‘[…] practices of sorting, naming, numbering, comparing, listing, and calculating’ (Lury et al., 2012: 3) have been promoting an increasingly ‘datafied’ school, yet not in linear, but rather in ‘messy’ ways. We use the example of (re)fabricating inequality to illuminate this messiness, which appears when inequality becomes inscribed into school monitoring/management tools as well as when inequality becomes (re)fabricated as soon as people work with these tools. Our findings suggest that while the datafication of school monitoring and management tools does increase the transparency in schools´/state agencies´ decision-making and teaching practices, it may also result in impactful inequalities of dataveillance. This ambivalence is constitutive for deep mediatization as an ongoing transformation process of the society at large.Teil eines Buches29 25