Skip navigation
SuUB logo
DSpace logo

  • Home
  • Institutions
    • University of Bremen
    • City University of Applied Sciences
    • Bremerhaven University of Applied Sciences
  • Sign on to:
    • My Media
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Account details

Citation link: https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/1600
Schmidt_Just-hitting-the-nail_2021_VoR_A.pdf
OpenAccess
 
copyright

Just Hitting the Nail or Also the Thumb? The Court’s Deference to Member States


File Description SizeFormat
Schmidt_Just-hitting-the-nail_2021_VoR_A.pdf817.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Authors: Schmidt, Susanne K.  
Abstract: 
The four freedoms are at the heart of the European integration project. Their proclaimed indivisibility contributed to the UK’s decision to withdraw from the EU, after limits to the free movement of persons were deemed unacceptable. Referring to Alexander Bickel’s analysis of the US Supreme Court, Zglinski’s ‘passive virtues’ refer to the practice of the European Court of Justice (the Court) to either grant member states’ executives and legislatures a margin of appreciation when regulating in the realm covered by free movement law, or to give their Courts scope for decentralised judicial enforcement. Such deference to the level of the member state, Zglinski argues, is the other side of the coin of the rise of the proportionality analysis, which empowers the Court to engage in far-reaching analyses of member states policies, entering genuinely political grounds under the ‘camouflage’ (p. 138) of a legal analysis.

The book offers a detailed and systematic analysis of the Court’s free movement case law, tracing the growth of these two kinds of deference to member state institutions. The positive, empirical analysis is followed in the text by a normative argument for deference to member states’ institutions. Thus, Zglinski’s book is a model example of legal scholarship engaging with social sciences’ quantitative methods to describe legal developments as well as making the more traditional normative arguments of the discipline. The discussion of how the Court does and should administer the reach of its case law, and where it should carve out a role for member state institutions, is extremely timely and relevant.

However, within this very convincing empirical and normative analysis, I struggle at times with the relatively mild interpretation of the findings. Is the extent of deference sufficient? Does the Court really meet its many challenges, given this empirical analysis, which uncovers a jurisprudence that is hardly guided by systematic rules and which seems haphazard? Zglinski’s comparison to the US experience, in particular, suggests that we may have to interpret the observations as hesitant steps in the right direction, falling short of what might, ideally, be required.

Given the empirical complexity of the analysis, I will summarise the findings of the book in some detail, before setting out the instances where I find the interpretation lacks bite. I embed this alternative, more sceptical interpretation in a short comparison with what we find in the US, building on the author’s comparisons with the US Supreme Court. I conclude by arguing that without contestation and critical discussion of the right balance, the European Court is not in a good position to successfully master the many challenges it faces.
Keywords: European Integration; Four freedoms; European Court of Justice; Book Review Essay
Issue Date: Jun-2021
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Journal/Edited collection: European Constitutional Law Review 
Start page: 353
End page: 367
Note: 2
Band: 17
Type: Artikel/Aufsatz
ISSN: 1744-5515
DOI: 10.26092/elib/1600
URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-elib59956
Institution: Universität Bremen 
Faculty: Fachbereich 08: Sozialwissenschaften (FB 08) 
Institute: Institut für Interkulturelle und Internationale Studien (InIIS) 
Appears in Collections:Forschungsdokumente

  

Page view(s)

35
checked on Jul 2, 2022

Download(s)

5
checked on Jul 2, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Media are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Legal notice -Feedback -Data privacy
Media - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE