Mixed Rules, Different Roles? An Analysis of the Typical Pathways into the Bundestag and of MPs' Parliamentary Behaviour
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mixed Rules and Different Roles_Manow_2013.pdf | 630.07 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Authors: | Manow, Philip ![]() |
Abstract: | Does the German mixed electoral system produce two types of representatives – MPs elected in the district who aim primarily to represent the interests of their constituencies and list MPs who are primarily loyal to their party or seek to serve ‘functional’ interest groups? The paper addresses this controversial question in two steps. It first uses sequence analysis in order to discover empirically just how prominent the exclusive ‘path into the Bundestag’ actually was by way of either the party list or the electoral district. The empirical basis is a data set covering all 3581 members of parliament from 1949 to 2009. Secondly, after having identified MPs with clear district or list careers, the paper replicates a study on committee membership asking whether district MPs sat more often in committees that are of relevance for their districts while list MPs more often sit in so- called ‘policy’ committees. The paper finds no evidence for a clear ‘mandate divide’ between MPs elected in a district and those numerous MPs entering parliament via the party list but also contesting a district. |
Keywords: | Germany; Political careers; Sequence analysis; Mixed-member electoral system; Legislative behaviour | Issue Date: | 2013 | Publisher: | Taylor & Francis | Journal/Edited collection: | The Journal of Legislative Studies | Issue: | 3 | Start page: | 287 | End page: | 308 | Volume: | 19 | Type: | Artikel/Aufsatz | ISSN: | 1743-9337 | Secondary publication: | yes | Document version: | Postprint | DOI: | 10.26092/elib/812 | URN: | urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-elib50151 | Institution: | Universität Bremen | Faculty: | Fachbereich 08: Sozialwissenschaften (FB 08) |
Appears in Collections: | Forschungsdokumente |
Page view(s)
123
checked on Apr 2, 2025
Download(s)
84
checked on Apr 2, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License