Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. SuUB
  3. Forschungsdokumente
  4. The role of mass media in promoting fake environmental controversies in Brazil
Citation link
10.26092/elib/5476

The role of mass media in promoting fake environmental controversies in Brazil

Date Issued
2026-01
Author(s)
Rajão, Raoni
Abstract
Fake controversies have influenced policy-making on health and environmental issues for decades, leading to major setbacks in the implementation of environmental conservation policies worldwide. In this paper, we expand on Rajão et al (2022) to examine fake controversies produced by a small group of Brazilian scientists that have had serious impacts on environmental conservation in the country, particularly regarding deforestation and climate change. Based on a literature review, we propose a typology of strategies deployed in fake controversies, including manufacturing uncertainty, misusing scientific credentials, and disregarding the scientific literature. We also argue that the spread of these fake debates has been amplified by mass media, which has often provided visibility to fringe claims and false equivalences in the name of balance or sensationalism. Editors and journalists have therefore played a key role in legitimizing and disseminating these controversies and should adopt more responsible practices when covering scientific issues. Subsequently, we examine the influence of these ‘fake-controversy makers’ on environmental policy-making, particularly within the National Congress. We further analyze the fake controversies promoted by these scientists and argue that, to properly understand them, it is necessary to consider a strategy that has so far been overlooked in the literature: the manufacture of alternative facts. Unlike in other contexts, where denialists primarily attempt to cast doubt on consensual issues by highlighting supposed uncertainties, in Brazil alternative facts on deforestation have been produced and circulated outside peer-reviewed literature. We conclude with recommendations on how professional journalism could help to counter fake scientific controversies and promote evidence-based environmental policy-making.
Subjects
Controversies

; 

Uncertainty

; 

Disinformation

; 

Deforestation

; 

Media

; 

Policy
Institution
Universität Bremen
Faculty
Zentrale Wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen und Kooperationen
Institute
Zentrum für Medien-, Kommunikations- und Informationsforschung (ZeMKI)
andere Institution
Type
book
Serie(s)
ZeMKI Working Papers
Band
0054
Secondary publication
No
License
Alle Rechte vorbehalten
Language
English
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

ZeMKI_EWP_54_Rajao_Archiv.pdf

Size

703.16 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):d0862b048842e7706dd082347ca39a39

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback