Zangl, BernhardReisinger, ChristianChristianReisinger2020-03-092020-03-092011-07-25https://media.suub.uni-bremen.de/handle/elib/261For the past two decades, the standard recipe to promote long-term peace in war-torn coun-tries was to create western-type state-structures. The success-rate of this model has been modest at best. Rather than new western-type states, we have witnessed the emergence of hybrid regimes in which external actors often remain engaged in the long-run. This disserta-tion makes the case to treat these new forms of hybrid regimes not as incomplete statebuild-ing processes, but rather as specific types of political regimes (post-conflict polities). Based on a qualitative review of 19 post-conflict countries, it differentiates between six types of post-conflict polities ( Let s Share polities, Doomed to Share polities, Let the Winner Take it All polities, The Winner Took it All polities, You Stay Out polities and Benevolent Intru-sion polities). In ten empirical case-studies, the different polity-types are characterized in detail.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPost-ConflictPeacebuildingPolityWarCivil WarPeacemakingUnited NationsTypologyTypologieFriedenskonsolidierungBürgerkriegVereinte NationenAfricaAfrikaLiberiaMozambiqueSierra LeoneDemocratic Republic of the CongoRwandaTajikistanMacedoniaBurundiEl SalvadorCôte d'IvoireElfenbeinküsteMosambikMazedonienRuandaDemokratische Republik Kongo320Dissertationurn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00102460-12