Gößling-Reisemann, Stefan
Loading...
Preferred name
Gößling-Reisemann, Stefan
Official Name
Gößling-Reisemann, Stefan
Alternative Name
Stefan Gößling
Stefan Gling-Reisemann
Stefan Gobling-Reisemann
Gössling-Reisemann, Stefan
Gößling-Reisemann, S.
ORCID
GND
3 results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Systems of Provision & Industrial Ecology: Neue Perspektiven für die Forschung zu nachhaltigem KonsumInsgesamt unterstreichen die Beiträge in diesem artec-paper, dass neue Erkenntnisse und Einsichten möglich werden, wenn die beiden Konzepte – das eher naturwissenschaftlichtechnisch fundierte Konzept Industrial Ecology und das eher sozialwissenschaftlichökonomische Konzept Systems of Provision – wechselseitig und mit Blick auf die Fragen und Probleme eines nachhaltigen Konsums aufeinander bezogen werden.ReportBand:162231 195 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Resilience Concept: From its historical roots to theoretical framework for critical infrastructure designThe initial article chooses a historical approach to the theoretical discussion of resilience notions by reconstructing the emergence of its manifold layers of meaning. The first part focuses on metaphor and concept transfers, each of which has produced a disciplinary conceptual tradition and a culture of resilience. The second part then describes the genesis of the system-theoretical “resilience framework” of the biologist and ecosystem researcher C. S. Holling, which still shapes the resilience discourse to this day. The second article reconstructs the roots and the development steps of the concept of resilience in energy systems, starting in the alternative energy discourse in the early 1970ies and ending in the first elaborated theory of resilient energy system design by Amory Lovins in 1982. Risk management and resilience management share important features and they both aim at preparing systems for uncertain threats or stressors and their impacts. Still, the level of uncertainty regarding stressors and impacts, the type of systems addressed and the systems’ dynamics allow for a distinction between the applicability of either risk or resilience management. The third article provides a short introduction to the specifics of each strategy for coping with uncertainty and presents guidelines for designing a resilient critical infrastructure.ReportBand:217842 6047 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Vulnerability and resilience of cyber- physical power systems: Results from an empirical-based study(2020-04); ; Power systems are undergoing a profound transformation towards cyber-physical systems. Disruptive changes due to energy system transition and the complexity of the interconnected systems expose the power system to new, unknown and unpredictable risks. To identify the critical points, a vulnerability assessment was conducted, involving experts from power as well as information and communication technologies (ICT) sectors. Weaknesses were identified e.g., the lack of policy enforcement worsened by the unreadiness of involved actors. The complex dynamics of ICT makes it infeasible to keep a complete inventory of potential stressors to define appropriate preparation and prevention mechanisms. Therefore, we suggest applying a resilience management approach to increase the resilience of the system. It aims at a better ride through failures rather than building higher walls. We conclude that building resilience in cyber-physical power systems is feasible and helps in preparing for the unexpected.ReportBand:222319 147